TEST 2011
Internal combustion
| Voluntary UNECE95 test | Performed - Approved |
|---|
In the frontal impact the driver and passenger heads were both well protected by the restrain system. The chest protection was adequate. There were no knee and tibia contact points visible for the driver on the dashboard which is desirable. But there were hazardous structures in the area of the facia that could be impacted by an larger occupants knees.
See protocol| CHILD RESTRAINT SYSTEM | Head / Chest | CRS type | Installation | Position | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18-month-old child | Peg Perego Primo Viaggio Tri-Fix | Protected / Good | 0+ | ISOFIX | |
| 3-year-old child | Peg Perego Viaggio1 Duo Fix ASIP | Protected / Fair | 1 | ISOFIX |
The child seat for the 1,5 and 3 year old child offered sufficient protection. The installation instructions on both child seats were insufficient and not permanently attached to the seat. The vehicle did give warnings as to the hazards associated with installing a rearward facing child seat on the front passenger seat with an active airbag. Both CRS have ISOFIX anchorage systems and were installed with the isofix connectors..
| Car information | |
|---|---|
| 4 door Sedan | 2011 |
| South Korea | 1627kg |
| Latin NCAP market |
| Safety equipment | |
|---|---|
| Driver frontal airbag | YES |
| Front passenger frontal airbag | YES |
| Side head airbags | NO |
| Side body airbags | YES |
| Driver knee airbag | NO |
| Front belt pretensioners | YES |