Toyota Yaris + 2 Airbags

16.57 points · 41%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

FRONTAL OFFSET DEFORMABLE BARRIER11 / 16 p

FRONT PASSENGER

DRIVER

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT2.16 / 3 p

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)6.38 / 8 p

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)

SIDE POLE IMPACTNO TEST

SIDE POLE IMPACT

UN R32 (max. 1 point)	1
Rescue Sheet (max. 1 point)	0
Fuel leakage detected after crash test	NO

COMMENTS:

Frontal impact: The protection offered to the driver and passenger head and neck was good. Driver’s chest showed marginal protection while passenger’s chest showed good protection. Driver and passenger’s knees showed marginal protection as they can impact with dangerous structures behind the fascia. Driver’s tibias showed good and adequate protection and passenger´s tibias showed good protection. Footwell area was rated as unstable. The bodyshell was rated as unstable and it is not capable of withstanding further loadings. Side impact: Head and pelvis protection was good while chest and abdomen protection was adequate. Side impact showed door opening. Side Pole Impact: was not performed as the car does not offer side head protection as standard. Whiplash: the seat showed marginal protection to the adult neck. UN R32: the car meets the rear impact structure requirements. AEB City: the car does not offer optional AEB city. Rescue sheet availability is not meeting Latin NCAP requirements.

See protocol

31.29 points · 64%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

Dynamic test score (max. 24)	CRS installation score (max. 12)	Vehicle assessment score (max. 13)
24.00	3.29	4.00

Occupant	Child restraint system	Score	CRS type	Installation	Position
18-month-old child	Joyson (Takata) MIDI	Frontal (max. 8): 8 Side (max. 4): 4	0+/I	ISOFIX/LEG	Rearward facing
3-year-old child	Joyson (Takata) MIDI	Frontal (max. 8): 8 Side (max. 4): 4	0+/I	ISOFIX/LEG	Rearward facing

Installation and equipment assessment
Feature	Front passenger	2nd row outboard	2nd row centre
ISOFIX	NOT AVAILABLE	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
i-Size	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE
Integrated CRS	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE

CRS installation assessment

		2nd row
Reference list		RIGHT	LEFT	CENTRE	RIGHT
Group 0+	Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable	Fail	Pass	Fail	Pass
Group 0+	Roemer Baby Safe	Fail	Pass	Exempt	Fail
Group 0+	Bébé Confort Streety Fix / Maxi Cosi Citi SPS	Fail	Pass	Fail	Pass
Group I	Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable FWF	Fail	Pass	Fail	Pass
Group I	Graco Cadeira Nautilus FWF	Fail	Pass	Fail	Pass
Group II/III	Burigotto Multipla 1,2,3	Fail	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Group II/III	Graco Cadeira Nautilus	Fail	Pass	Exempt	Pass

		2nd row
Manufacturer		RIGHT	LEFT	CENTRE	RIGHT
Manufacturer Q1.5	Joyson Takata Midi	Fail	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Manufacturer Q3	Joyson Takata Midi	Fail	Pass	Exempt	Pass

*Fail only due to failed marking

COMMENTS:

The child seat for the 3-year-old child was installed rearward facing using ISOFIX anchorages and support leg. It was capable of preventing head exposure and frontal crash protection was good. Side impact protection was good. The Q1.5 was installed rearward facing using ISOFIX anchorages and support leg, it was capable of preventing head exposure and frontal crash protection was good. Side impact protection was good. Some of the CRSs tested for installation pass. Airbag warning when a rearward CRS is installed in the passenger seat was according to Latin NCAP requirements. Passenger airbag could not be disconnected in the case that a rearward facing CRS is installed in the front passenger seat.

See protocol

25.98 points · 62%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION (PASSIVE)

15.00 points

UN127 pedestrian protection regulation

DOES NOT MEET

	Points	Maximum score
Head impact	15.06	24
Upper leg impact (pelvis)	6.00	6
Lower leg impact	4.66	6

PEDESTRIAN AEB

0 points

Pedestrian balancing factor (until 2022)

15.00

PERFORMANCE

Summary

Percentage

COMMENTS:

The car manufacturer did not prove that the car meets Pedestrian protection UN regulations for the Brazilian or Thai version. The car showed majority of areas with adequate to marginal protection levels. AEB VRU: not available in the market for this model.

See protocol

18.00 points · 42%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

Warning	Driver	Passenger		Rear passengers
SPEED ASSISTANCE (this feature scores only if it is standard in all versions)	0.00	SEAT BELT REMINDER (this feature scores only if it is standard in all versions)		3.00
Visual	OK	NOT OK		NOT OK
Audible	OK	NOT OK		NOT OK
LANE SUPPORT SYSTEMS				-
Fail
Fail
System name		-
Functionality		-
Operational from (km/h)		-
Warning		-
LKA Test		-
LDW Test		-
ROAD EDGE DETECTION				-
-
BLIND SPOT DETECTION				-
-
ESC				15.00
ESC is STANDARD IN ALL VERSIONS
ESC Meets regulatory requirements of Latin NCAP
ADAC MOOSE TEST
Maximum faultless test speed (km/h)				85
MOOSE TEST: CONSUMER TEST
Maximum faultless test speed (km/h)				75
INTERURBAN AEB				-
System name		-
Functionality		Not available
Operational from (km/h)		-
Operational speed (km/h) Min \| Max — AEB		0 km/h
Operational speed (km/h) Min \| Max — Driver reacts to warning		0 km/h
Approaching a slower moving car — AEB		Crash avoided up to 65 km/h
Approaching a slower moving car — Driver reacts to warning		crash avoided up to 80 km/h
FOLLOWING A CAR AT SHORT DISTANCE
	AEB		Driver reacts to warning
Car in front brakes gently	Failed		Failed
Car in front brakes hard	Failed		Failed
FOLLOWING A CAR AT LONG DISTANCE
	AEB		Driver reacts to warning
Car in front brakes gently	Failed		Failed
Car in front brakes hard	Failed		Failed

COMMENTS:

The car offers ESC as standard. Moose test max speed was 85 for the ADAC Moose scenario and 75km.h for the Consumer testing scenario. SBR: the car offers front passengers SBR but passenger side SBR did not detect certain passengers being rated as a fail. SA: the car does not offer a speed limitation device. BSD: The car does not offer BSD as standard. LSS and RED: the car does not offer these technologies. AEB Interurban: The car does not have AEB inter urban.

See protocol

Car information
Yaris	1387
5 door Hatchback - sedan	Thailand & Brazil
2021	Latin NCAP market

Safety information	Driver	Passenger	Rear
Frontal protection
Frontal airbag	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT APPLICABLE
Seat belt pretensioner	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Seat belt load limiter	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Knee airbag	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT APPLICABLE
Side protection
Side head curtain airbag	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
Side head-thorax airbag	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE
Side chest airbag	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NOT AVAILABLE
Side pelvis airbag	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE
Child protection
ISOFIX	NOT APPLICABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	YES OUTBOARD SEATS
Integrated CRS	NOT APPLICABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NO
Airbag cut-off switch	NOT APPLICABLE	NO	NOT APPLICABLE
Safety Assist Systems
Seat belt reminder (SBR)	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Other safety systems
Standard ESC	YES STANDARD
GTR 9-UN 127 Pedestrian protection	DOES NOT MEET
Pedestrian AEB	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
City AEB	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
Interurban AEB	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
Speed assistance system	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
Lane assistance system	NO - JUST OPTIONAL

FRONT PASSENGER

DRIVER

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)

SIDE POLE IMPACT

Tit