Peugeot 208 + 4 Airbags

20.61 points · 52%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

FRONTAL OFFSET DEFORMABLE BARRIER12.1 / 16 p

FRONT PASSENGER

DRIVER

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT2.48 / 3 p

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)8 / 8 p

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)

SIDE POLE IMPACTNO TEST

SIDE POLE IMPACT

UN R32 (max. 1 point)	1
AEB City (max. 3 points)	NO TEST
Rescue Sheet (max. 1 point)	1
Fuel leakage detected after crash test	NO

COMMENTS:

Frontal impact: The protection offered to the driver and passenger head and neck was good. Driver chest showed marginal protection and passenger chest showed adequate protection. Driver knees showed adequate protection as they can impact with dangerous structures in the steering column, passenger’s knees showed good protection. Driver and passenger’s tibias showed adequate protection. Footwell area was rated as unstable. The bodyshell was rated as unstable and it is not capable of withstanding further loadings. Side impact: Head, chest, abdomen and pelvis protection was good. Side Pole Impact: was not performed as the car does not offer side head protection as standard. Whiplash: the seat showed good protection to the adult neck. UN R32: the car meets the rear impact structure requirements. AEB City: the car offers optional AEB city but does not meet minimum requirements to score points. AEB points could not be considered, fitment rates also need to be matched. Rescue sheet: met Latin NCAP requirements.

See protocol

points · 55%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

Dynamic test score (max. 24)	CRS installation score (max. 12)	Vehicle assessment score (max. 13)
20.10	3.81	3.00

Occupant	Child restraint system	Score	CRS type	Installation	Position
18-month-old child	Britax Roemer Baby Safe + ISOFIX BASE	Frontal (max. 8): 7.26 Side (max. 4): 4.00	0+	ISOFIX/LEG	Rearward facing
3-year-old child	Britax Roemer Duo Plus + ISOFIX TT	Frontal (max. 8): 4.84 Side (max. 4): 4.00	I	ISOFIX/TT	Forward facing

Installation and equipment assessment
Feature	Front passenger	2nd row outboard	2nd row centre
ISOFIX	NOT AVAILABLE	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
i-Size	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE
Integrated CRS	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE

CRS installation assessment

		2nd row
Reference list		RIGHT	LEFT	CENTRE	RIGHT
Group 0+	Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable	Fail	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group 0+	Roemer Baby Safe	Fail	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Group 0+	Bébé Confort Streety Fix / Maxi Cosi Citi SPS	Fail	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group I	Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable FWF	Fail	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group I	Graco Cadeira Nautilus FWF	Fail	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group II/III	Burigotto Multipla 1,2,3	Fail	Fail	Pass	Fail
Group II/III	Graco Cadeira Nautilus	Fail	Fail	Pass	Fail

		2nd row
Manufacturer		RIGHT	LEFT	CENTRE	RIGHT
Manufacturer Q1.5	Britax Roemer Baby Safe	Fail	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Manufacturer Q3	Britax Roemer Duo Plus	Exempt	Pass	Exempt	Pass

*Fail only due to failed marking

COMMENTS:

The child seat for the 3-year-old child was not able to prevent excessive forward movement during the impact as the rear seat backrest unlatched during the frontal impact. As the manufacturer brought improvements the car was retested without the rear backrest unlatching during the test. Head was exposed in the case of rear backrest unlatched and protected when rear seat backrest did not unlatch. Side impact protection was good. The dynamic performance of the 18 months child restraint systems was good for frontal and side impact protection. Both CRSs were installed using the ISOFIX anchorages, with Top Tether for the 3 years old CRS and support leg for the 18months old. The car offers 3-point belts in all seating positions as standard in all versions. It was not possible to disconnect the passenger airbag in case a rearward facing CRS will be installed in this position. I-size conditions were not met by this car. The CRS installation pass for some CRS assessed only.

See protocol

25.98 points · 54%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION (PASSIVE)

15.00 points

UN127 pedestrian protection regulation

DOES NOT MEET

	Points	Maximum score
Head impact	14.77	24
Upper leg impact (pelvis)	2.26	6
Lower leg impact	6	6

PEDESTRIAN AEB

0.00 points

Pedestrian balancing factor (until 2022)

PERFORMANCE

Summary

Percentage

COMMENTS:

The car does not prove to meet pedestrian protection UN regulations. The car showed majority of areas average (marginal)/ adequate protection levels. Upper leg performance showed less protection than the same model in Europe. AEB VRU: AEB VRU was not assessed as the preconditions for AEB scoring are not met.

See protocol

24.00 points · 56%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

Warning	Driver	Passenger		Rear passengers
SPEED ASSISTANCE (this feature scores only if it is standard in all versions)	3.00	SEAT BELT REMINDER (this feature scores only if it is standard in all versions)		6.00
Visual	OK	OK		NOT OK
Audible	OK	OK		NOT OK
LANE SUPPORT SYSTEMS				-
-
-
System name		-
Functionality		-
Operational from (km/h)		-
Warning		-
LKA Test		-
LDW Test		-
ROAD EDGE DETECTION				-
-
BLIND SPOT DETECTION				-
-
ESC				15.00
ESC is STANDARD IN ALL VERSIONS
ESC Meets regulatory requirements of Latin NCAP
ADAC MOOSE TEST
Maximum faultless test speed (km/h)				85
MOOSE TEST: CONSUMER TEST
Maximum faultless test speed (km/h)				80
INTERURBAN AEB				-
System name		-
Functionality		-
Operational from (km/h)		-
Operational speed (km/h) Min \| Max — AEB		-
Operational speed (km/h) Min \| Max — Driver reacts to warning		-
Approaching a slower moving car — AEB		-
Approaching a slower moving car — Driver reacts to warning		-
FOLLOWING A CAR AT SHORT DISTANCE
	AEB		Driver reacts to warning
Car in front brakes gently	-		-
Car in front brakes hard	-		-
FOLLOWING A CAR AT LONG DISTANCE
	AEB		Driver reacts to warning
Car in front brakes gently	-		-
Car in front brakes hard	-		-

COMMENTS:

The car offers ESC as standard. The moose test performance reached a maximum of 85 km/h under ADAC Moose test and 75 km/h under Consumer magazine Moose test. SBR: The car does not offer rear SBR. SA: the car offers a speed limitation device. BSD: The car does not offer BSD. LSS and RED: the car offers an optional LSS system but not RED, however due to preconditions required these cannot be considered for scoring. AEB Interurban: the car offers an optional AEB system, however due to preconditions required it cannot be considered for scoring. Minimum fitment rate must also match requirements.

See protocol

Car information
208	1409
5 door Hatchback - sedan	Argentina
2021	Latin NCAP market

Safety information	Driver	Passenger	Rear
Frontal protection
Frontal airbag	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT APPLICABLE
Seat belt pretensioner	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Seat belt load limiter	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Knee airbag	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT APPLICABLE
Side protection
Side head curtain airbag	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
Side head-thorax airbag	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE
Side chest airbag	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Side pelvis airbag	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE
Child protection
ISOFIX	NOT APPLICABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	YES OUTBOARD SEATS
Integrated CRS	NOT APPLICABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NO
Airbag cut-off switch	NOT APPLICABLE	NO	NOT APPLICABLE
Safety Assist Systems
Seat belt reminder (SBR)	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Other safety systems
Standard ESC	YES MANUAL
GTR 9-UN 127 Pedestrian protection	DOES NOT MEET
Pedestrian AEB	NOT AVAILABLE
City AEB	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
Interurban AEB	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
Speed assistance system	YES STANDARD
Lane assistance system	NO - JUST OPTIONAL

FRONT PASSENGER

DRIVER

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)

SIDE POLE IMPACT

Tit