Hyundai Tucson + 2 Airbags

20.09 points · 50%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

FRONTAL OFFSET DEFORMABLE BARRIER13.9 / 16 p

FRONT PASSENGER

DRIVER

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT2.18 / 3 p

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)8 / 8 p

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)

SIDE POLE IMPACTNO TEST

SIDE POLE IMPACT

UN R32 (max. 1 point)	1
AEB City (max. 3 points)	NO TEST
Rescue Sheet (max. 1 point)	1
Fuel leakage detected after crash test	NO

COMMENTS:

Frontal impact: The protection offered to the driver and passenger head and neck was good. Driver and passenger chest showed good protection. Driver and passenger’s knees showed marginal protection as they can impact with dangerous structures behind the fascia. Driver tibias showed adequate and good protection while passengers tibias showed good protection. Footwell area was rated as stable. The bodyshell was rated stable. Side impact: Head, chest, abdomen and pelvis protection was good. Side Pole Impact: Was not performed as the car does not offer side head protection as standard. Whiplash: The seat showed marginal protection to the adult neck. UN R32: the car meets the rear impact structure requirements. AEB City: the car offers optional AEB city meeting the performance requirements but does not fulfil Latin NCAP preconditions and availability requirements for scoring. Rescue sheet: Met Latin NCAP requirements.

See protocol

2.62 points · 5%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

Dynamic test score (max. 24)	CRS installation score (max. 12)	Vehicle assessment score (max. 13)
0	2.62	0

Occupant	Child restraint system	Score	CRS type	Installation	Position
18-month-old child	JOIE SPIN 360 - ISOFIX/LEG	Frontal (max. 8): 8.00 Side (max. 4): 4.00	0+/I	ISOFIX/LEG	Rearward facing
3-year-old child	JOIE SPIN 360 - ISOFIX/LEG	Frontal (max. 8): 8.00 Side (max. 4): 4.00	0+/I	ISOFIX/LEG	Rearward facing

Installation and equipment assessment
Feature	Front passenger	2nd row outboard	2nd row centre
ISOFIX	NOT AVAILABLE	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
i-Size	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE
Integrated CRS	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE

CRS installation assessment

		2nd row
Reference list		RIGHT	LEFT	CENTRE	RIGHT
Group 0+	Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable	Fail	Pass	Fail	Pass
Group 0+	Roemer Baby Safe	Fail	Fail	Exempt	Fail
Group 0+	Bébé Confort Streety Fix / Maxi Cosi Citi SPS	Fail	Pass	Fail	Pass
Group I	Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable FWF	Exempt	Pass	Fail	Pass
Group I	Graco Cadeira Nautilus FWF	Exempt	Pass	Fail	Pass
Group II/III	Burigotto Multipla 1,2,3	Exempt	Pass	Fail	Pass
Group II/III	Graco Cadeira Nautilus	Exempt	Pass	Fail	Pass

		2nd row
Manufacturer		RIGHT	LEFT	CENTRE	RIGHT
Manufacturer Q1.5	Joie Spin 360 - ISOFIX/LEG	Fail	Fail	Exempt	Fail
Manufacturer Q3	Joie Spin 360 - ISOFIX/LEG	Fail	Fail	Exempt	Fail

*Fail only due to failed marking

COMMENTS:

The child seat for the 3-year-old child was installed rearward facing using ISOFIX anchorages and support leg. It was capable of preventing head exposure and offered good protection. Side Impact: The CRS offered full protection. The Q1.5 was installed rearward facing using ISOFIX anchorages and support leg, the CRS prevented the head exposure offering full protection. Side Impact: The CRS offered full protection. Several of the CRSs tested for installation failed. Despite having standard ISOFIX anchorages in rear outboard positions marking was not according to Latin NCAP criteria. The rear centre position is equipped with a lap belt only as standard. Airbag warning when a rearward CRS is installed in the passenger seat meets Latin NCAP requirements. The car does not have a passenger airbag disconnection switch as standard equipment.

See protocol

23.23 points · 48%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION (PASSIVE)

15 points

UN127 pedestrian protection regulation

MEETS UN127 REGULATION

	Points	Maximum score
Head impact	14.43	24
Upper leg impact (pelvis)	2.80	6
Lower leg impact	6.00	6

PEDESTRIAN AEB

0.00 points

Pedestrian balancing factor (until 2022)

System name

Minimum speed range (km/h)

Maximum speed range (km/h)

Road user type

Impact speed

System use

PERFORMANCE

Summary

Percentage

COMMENTS:

The car meets Pedestrian Protection UN regulations. The car showed areas with good protection levels. Upper leg performance showed areas with poor protection. AEB VRU: the car offers optional AEB VRU showing good performance but does not fulfil Latin NCAP precondition and availability requirements for scoring.

See protocol

3.00 points · 7%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

Warning	Driver	Passenger		Rear passengers
SPEED ASSISTANCE (this feature scores only if it is standard in all versions)	0.00	SEAT BELT REMINDER (this feature scores only if it is standard in all versions)		3.00
Visual	OK	NOT OK		NOT OK
Audible	OK	NOT OK		NOT OK
LANE SUPPORT SYSTEMS				-
-
-
System name		-
Functionality		-
Operational from (km/h)		-
Warning		-
LKA Test		-
LDW Test		-
ROAD EDGE DETECTION				-
-
BLIND SPOT DETECTION				-
-
ESC				-
-
ADAC MOOSE TEST
Maximum faultless test speed (km/h)				-
MOOSE TEST: CONSUMER TEST
Maximum faultless test speed (km/h)				-
INTERURBAN AEB				-
System name		-
Functionality		-
Operational from (km/h)		-
Operational speed (km/h) Min \| Max — AEB		-
Operational speed (km/h) Min \| Max — Driver reacts to warning		-
Approaching a slower moving car — AEB		-
Approaching a slower moving car — Driver reacts to warning		-
FOLLOWING A CAR AT SHORT DISTANCE
	AEB		Driver reacts to warning
Car in front brakes gently	-		-
Car in front brakes hard	-		-
FOLLOWING A CAR AT LONG DISTANCE
	AEB		Driver reacts to warning
Car in front brakes gently	-		-
Car in front brakes hard	-		-

COMMENTS:

SBR: The car does not offer front passenger or rear SBR. ESC: The car does not offer ESC as standard. SAS: the car does not offer standard speed limitation device. BSD: The car does not offer BSD. LSS and RED: the car offers optional LSS and RED showing good performance but does not fulfil Latin NCAP availability and preconditions requirements for scoring. AEB Interurban: the car offers optional AEB IU showing good performance but does not fulfil Latin NCAP availability and preconditions requirements for scoring.

See protocol

Car information
Tucson	1703
5 door SUV	Korea, Czech Republic
2022	Latin NCAP market

Safety information	Driver	Passenger	Rear
Frontal protection
Frontal airbag	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT APPLICABLE
Seat belt pretensioner	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Seat belt load limiter	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Knee airbag	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT APPLICABLE
Side protection
Side head curtain airbag	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
Side head-thorax airbag	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE
Side chest airbag	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NOT AVAILABLE
Side pelvis airbag	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE
Child protection
ISOFIX	NOT APPLICABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	YES OUTBOARD SEATS
Integrated CRS	NOT APPLICABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE
Airbag cut-off switch	NOT APPLICABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT APPLICABLE
Safety Assist Systems
Seat belt reminder (SBR)	YES STANDARD	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NOT AVAILABLE
Other safety systems
Standard ESC	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
GTR 9-UN 127 Pedestrian protection	MEETS UN127 STANDARD
Pedestrian AEB	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
City AEB	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
Interurban AEB	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
Speed assistance system	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
Lane assistance system	NO - JUST OPTIONAL

FRONT PASSENGER

DRIVER

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)

SIDE POLE IMPACT

Tit