Honda WR-V + 2 Airbags

16.41 points · 41%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

FRONTAL OFFSET DEFORMABLE BARRIER12.2 / 16 p

FRONT PASSENGER

DRIVER

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT2.25 / 3 p

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)7 / 8 p

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)

SIDE POLE IMPACTNO TEST

SIDE POLE IMPACT

UN R32 (max. 1 point)	1
Rescue Sheet (max. 1 point)	0
Fuel leakage detected after crash test	NO

COMMENTS:

Adult Occupant - Frontal impact: The protection offered to the driver and passenger head and neck was good. Driver and passenger chest showed adequate protection. Driver and passenger’s knees showed marginal protection as they can impact with dangerous structures behind the fascia. Driver tibias showed adequate protection and passenger´s tibias showed good protection. Footwell area was rated as stable. The bodyshell was rated as stable. Side impact: Head, abdomen and pelvis protection was good and chest protection was marginal. Side Pole Impact: was not performed as the car does not offer side head protection as standard. Whiplash: the seat showed good protection to the adult neck. UN R32: the car meets the rear impact structure requirements. AEB City: the car does not offer AEB City. Rescue sheet: not available.

See protocol

19.92 points · 41%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

Dynamic test score (max. 24)	CRS installation score (max. 12)	Vehicle assessment score (max. 13)
14.64	5.28	0.00

Occupant	Child restraint system	Score	CRS type	Installation	Position
18-month-old child	Britax roemer baby safe	Frontal (max. 8): 7.70 Side (max. 4): 4.00	0+	Belted	Rearward facing
3-year-old child	Britax Roem	Frontal (max. 8): 6.94 Side (max. 4): 4.00	I	ISOFIX/TT	Forward facing

Installation and equipment assessment
Feature	Front passenger	2nd row outboard	2nd row centre
ISOFIX	NOT AVAILABLE	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
i-Size	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE
Integrated CRS	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE

CRS installation assessment

		2nd row
Reference list		RIGHT	LEFT	CENTRE	RIGHT
Group 0+	Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable	Fail	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group 0+	Roemer Baby Safe	Fail	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Group 0+	Bébé Confort Streety Fix / Maxi Cosi Citi SPS	Fail	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group I	Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable FWF	Pass	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group I	Graco Cadeira Nautilus FWF	Pass	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group II/III	Burigotto Multipla 1,2,3	Pass	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group II/III	Graco Cadeira Nautilus	Pass	Pass	Pass	Pass

		2nd row
Manufacturer		RIGHT	LEFT	CENTRE	RIGHT
Manufacturer Q1.5	Britax roemer baby safe Belted	Fail	Pass	Pass	Pass
Manufacturer Q3	Britax roemer duo plus ISOFIX/LEG	Exempt	Pass	Exempt	Pass

*Fail only due to failed marking

COMMENTS:

Child Occupant - The child seat for the 3-year-old child was installed forward facing using the ISOFIX anchorages and Top Tether and was able to prevent excessive forward movement of the head during the impact. The 18 months old child seat was installed rearward facing using the seatbelt and could prevent the head to be exposed in the frontal impact. Both CRSs offered good protection in the side impact. The car offers 3-point belts in all seating positions as standard in all versions. It was not possible to disconnect the passenger airbag in case a rearward facing CRS will be installed in this position. I-size conditions were not met by this car. Some of the CRS failed the installation.

See protocol

28.23 points · 59%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION (PASSIVE)

15 points

UN127 pedestrian protection regulation

MEETS UN127 REGULATION

	Points	Maximum score
Head impact	16.23	24
Upper leg impact (pelvis)	6	6
Lower leg impact	6	6

PEDESTRIAN AEB

0.00 points

Pedestrian balancing factor (until 2022)

System name

Minimum speed range (km/h)

Maximum speed range (km/h)

Road user type

Impact speed

System use

PERFORMANCE

Summary

Percentage

COMMENTS:

Pedestrian Protection - The car meets Pedestrian protection UN regulations. The car showed majority of areas with average and marginal protection levels. Upper and lower leg performance showed good protection. AEB VRU: the car does not offer AEB VRU.

See protocol

21.00 points · 49%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

Warning	Driver	Passenger		Rear passengers
SPEED ASSISTANCE (this feature scores only if it is standard in all versions)	0.00	SEAT BELT REMINDER (this feature scores only if it is standard in all versions)		6.00
Visual	OK	OK		NOT OK
Audible	OK	OK		NOT OK
LANE SUPPORT SYSTEMS				-
LDW is not available according to Latin NCAP requirements
LKA is not available according to Latin NCAP requirements
System name		-
Functionality		-
Operational from (km/h)		-
Warning		-
LKA Test		-
LDW Test		-
ROAD EDGE DETECTION				-
RED not is available according to Lat in NCAP requirements
BLIND SPOT DETECTION				-
BSD is not available according to Latin NCAP requirements BSD could not be confirmed by Validation
ESC				15
ESC is STANDARD IN ALL VERSIONS
ESC Meets regulatory requirements of Latin NCAP
ADAC MOOSE TEST
Maximum faultless test speed (km/h)				85
MOOSE TEST: CONSUMER TEST
Maximum faultless test speed (km/h)				75
INTERURBAN AEB				-
System name		-
Functionality		-
Operational from (km/h)		-
Operational speed (km/h) Min \| Max — AEB		-
Operational speed (km/h) Min \| Max — Driver reacts to warning		-
Approaching a slower moving car — AEB		-
Approaching a slower moving car — Driver reacts to warning		-
FOLLOWING A CAR AT SHORT DISTANCE
	AEB		Driver reacts to warning
Car in front brakes gently	-		-
Car in front brakes hard	-		-
FOLLOWING A CAR AT LONG DISTANCE
	AEB		Driver reacts to warning
Car in front brakes gently	-		-
Car in front brakes hard	-		-

COMMENTS:

Safety Assist – SBR: The car only offers frontal SBR and it does not offer rear SBR. ESC: The car offers ESC as standard. The Moose test performance reached a maximum of 85 km/h under ADAC Moose test and 75 km/h under Consumer magazine Moose test. SA: the car does not offer a speed limitation device. BSD: The car does not offer BSD. LSS and RED: the car does not offer an LSS system. AEB Interurban: the car does not offer an optional AEB system.

See protocol

Car information
WR-V	1340
5 door Hatchback - Sedan	Brazil
2022	Latin NCAP market

Safety information	Driver	Passenger	Rear
Frontal protection
Frontal airbag	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT APPLICABLE
Seat belt pretensioner	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Seat belt load limiter	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Knee airbag	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT APPLICABLE
Side protection
Side head curtain airbag	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
Side head-thorax airbag	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE
Side chest airbag	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NOT AVAILABLE
Side pelvis airbag	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE
Child protection
ISOFIX	NOT APPLICABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	YES OUTBOARD SEATS
Integrated CRS	NOT APPLICABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NO
Airbag cut-off switch	NOT APPLICABLE	NO	NOT APPLICABLE
Safety Assist Systems
Seat belt reminder (SBR)	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Other safety systems
Standard ESC	YES STANDARD
GTR 9-UN 127 Pedestrian protection	MEETS UN127 STANDARD
Pedestrian AEB	NOT AVAILABLE
City AEB	NOT AVAILABLE
Interurban AEB	NOT AVAILABLE
Speed assistance system	NOT AVAILABLE
Lane assistance system	NOT AVAILABLE

FRONT PASSENGER

DRIVER

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)

SIDE POLE IMPACT

Tit