Mitsubishi Outlander + 7 Airbags

34.84 points · 87%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

FRONTAL OFFSET DEFORMABLE BARRIER12.6 / 16 p

FRONT PASSENGER

DRIVER

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT2.38 / 3 p

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)8 / 8 p

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)

SIDE POLE IMPACT7.82 / 8 p

SIDE POLE IMPACT

UN R32 (max. 1 point)	1
AEB City (max. 3 points)	3
Rescue Sheet (max. 1 point)	0
Fuel leakage detected after crash test	NO

COMMENTS:

Adult Occupant - Frontal impact: The protection offered to the driver and passenger head, neck and chest was good. Driver and passenger´s knees showed marginal protection. Driver and passenger´s tibias showed good and adequate protection. Footwell area was rated as unstable and symmetrical between driver and passenger side after audit on the PHEV variant. The bodyshell was rated as stable and capable of withstanding further loadings. Side impact: Head, chest, abdomen and pelvis protection was good. Side Pole Impact: head, abdomen and pelvis protection was good, chest protection was adequate. The car is fitted with a centre airbag in some markets but not as standard. Whiplash: the seat showed good protection to the adult neck. UN R32: the car meet the rear impact structure requirements. AEB City: the car offers AEB City as optional, meeting Latin NCAP technical and availability requirements. Rescue sheet: not available.

See protocol

44.75 points · 91%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

Dynamic test score (max. 24)	CRS installation score (max. 12)	Vehicle assessment score (max. 13)
23.23	11.52	10.00

Occupant	Child restraint system	Score	CRS type	Installation	Position
18-month-old child	Joie Spin 360	Frontal (max. 8): 8.00 Side (max. 4): 4.00	0+/I	ISOFIX/LEG	Rearward facing
3-year-old child	Joie Spin 360	Frontal (max. 8): 7.23 Side (max. 4): 4.00	0+/I	ISOFIX/LEG	Rearward facing

Installation and equipment assessment
Feature	Front passenger	2nd row outboard	2nd row centre
ISOFIX	NOT AVAILABLE	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
i-Size	NOT AVAILABLE	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Integrated CRS	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE

CRS installation assessment

		2nd row
Reference list		RIGHT	LEFT	CENTRE	RIGHT
Group 0+	Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable	Pass	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group 0+	Roemer Baby Safe	Exempt	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Group 0+	Bébé Confort Streety Fix / Maxi Cosi Citi SPS	Pass	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group I	Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable FWF	Pass	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group I	Graco Cadeira Nautilus FWF	Pass	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group II/III	Burigotto Multipla 1,2,3	Pass	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group II/III	Graco Cadeira Nautilus	Pass	Pass	Pass	Pass

		2nd row
Manufacturer		RIGHT	LEFT	CENTRE	RIGHT
Manufacturer Q1.5	Joie Spin 360 - ISOFIX/LEG	Exempt	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Manufacturer Q3	Joie Spin 360 - ISOFIX/LEG	Exempt	Pass	Exempt	Pass

*Fail only due to failed marking

COMMENTS:

Child Occupant - The child seat for the 3-year-old child was installed rearward facing using ISOFIX anchorages and support leg. It was capable of preventing head exposure and offered good protection. The Q1.5 was installed rearward facing using ISOFIX anchorages and support leg, the CRS prevented the head exposure offering full protection. Side Impact: Both CRSs offered full protection. Only one of the CRSs tested for installation failed. The car has ISOFIX anchorages as standard, meeting also the i-size marking requirements. All seating positions are equipped with three-point seatbelts. Airbag warning when a rearward CRS is installed in the passenger seat meets Latin NCAP requirements. The car has automatic passenger airbag disconnection as standard.

See protocol

26.26 points · 55%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION (PASSIVE)

points

UN127 pedestrian protection regulation

MEETS UN127 REGULATION

	Points	Maximum score
Head impact	18.18	24
Upper leg impact (pelvis)	2.08	6
Lower leg impact	6.00	6

PEDESTRIAN AEB

0.00 points

Pedestrian balancing factor (until 2022)

System name

Minimum speed range (km/h)

Maximum speed range (km/h)

Road user type

Impact speed

System use

PERFORMANCE

Summary

Percentage

COMMENTS:

Pedestrian Protection - The car meets Pedestrian protection UN127 regulations. The car showed majority of areas with average and good protection levels. Upper leg performance was overall poor, lower leg performance was good. AEB VRU: the car offers AEB VRU as optional, but not meeting Latin NCAP availability requirements.

See protocol

36.19 points · 84%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

Warning	Driver	Passenger		Rear passengers
SPEED ASSISTANCE (this feature scores only if it is standard in all versions)	0.00	SEAT BELT REMINDER (this feature scores only if it is standard in all versions)		10.00
Visual	OK	OK		OK
Audible	OK	OK		OK
LANE SUPPORT SYSTEMS				-
-
-
System name		-
Functionality		-
Operational from (km/h)		-
Warning		-
LKA Test		-
LDW Test		-
ROAD EDGE DETECTION				-
RED not available
BLIND SPOT DETECTION				3.00
BSD available acording to Latin NCAP requirements
ESC				15
ESC is standard in all versions
ESC meets regulatory requirements of Latin NCAP
ADAC MOOSE TEST
Maximum faultless test speed (km/h)				90
MOOSE TEST: CONSUMER TEST
Maximum faultless test speed (km/h)				75
INTERURBAN AEB				8.19
System name		-
Functionality		FCW and AEB
Operational from (km/h)		5
Operational speed (km/h) Min \| Max — AEB		5 km/h - 180 km/h
Operational speed (km/h) Min \| Max — Driver reacts to warning		5 km/h - 180 km/h
Approaching a slower moving car — AEB		Choque evitado hasta 65 km/h
Approaching a slower moving car — Driver reacts to warning		Choque evitado hasta 80 km/h
FOLLOWING A CAR AT SHORT DISTANCE
	AEB		Driver reacts to warning
Car in front brakes gently	Avoidance		Avoidance
Car in front brakes hard	Avoidance		Avoidance
FOLLOWING A CAR AT LONG DISTANCE
	AEB		Driver reacts to warning
Car in front brakes gently	Avoidance		Avoidance
Car in front brakes hard	Avoidance		Avoidance

COMMENTS:

Safety Assist - SBR: The car offers SBR in all seating positions. ESC: The car offers ESC as standard. The Moose test performance reached a maximum of 80 km/h under ADAC Moose test and 70 km/h under Consumer magazine Moose test. SA: the car does not offer a speed limitation device as standard. BSD: The car offers BSD meeting Latin NCAP technical and availability requirements for short and long range. LSS and RED: The car offers LSS and RED, but not meeting Latin NCAP availability requirements. It was not assessed. AEB Interurban: The car offers AEB Inter Urban meeting Latin NCAP technical and availability requirements.

See protocol

Car information
Outlander	1967
5 door SUV	Japan
2022	Latin NCAP market

Safety information	Driver	Passenger	Rear
Frontal protection
Frontal airbag	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT APPLICABLE
Seat belt pretensioner	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Seat belt load limiter	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Knee airbag	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT APPLICABLE
Side protection
Side head curtain airbag	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD
Side head-thorax airbag	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE
Side chest airbag	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Side pelvis airbag	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Child protection
ISOFIX	NOT APPLICABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	YES OUTBOARD SEATS
Integrated CRS	NOT APPLICABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE
Airbag cut-off switch	NOT APPLICABLE	YES AUTOMATIC	NOT AVAILABLE
Safety Assist Systems
Seat belt reminder (SBR)	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD
Other safety systems
Standard ESC	YES STANDARD
GTR 9-UN 127 Pedestrian protection	MEETS UN127 STANDARD
Pedestrian AEB	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
City AEB	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
Interurban AEB	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
Speed assistance system	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
Lane assistance system	NO - JUST OPTIONAL

FRONT PASSENGER

DRIVER

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)

SIDE POLE IMPACT

Tit