Jeep Renegade + 2 Airbags

19.48 points · 49%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

FRONTAL OFFSET DEFORMABLE BARRIER14.5 / 16 p

FRONT PASSENGER

DRIVER

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT2.3 / 3 p

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)6.72 / 8 p

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)

SIDE POLE IMPACTNO TEST

SIDE POLE IMPACT

UN R32 (max. 1 point)	1
AEB City (max. 3 points)	-
Rescue Sheet (max. 1 point)	1
Fuel leakage detected after crash test	NO

COMMENTS:

The protection offered to the driver and passenger head and neck was good, Driver´s chest was adequate and passenger chest was good. Driver and passenger´s knees showed good protection. Driver tibias showed adequate protection and passenger´s tibias showed good protection. Footwell area was rated as stable and symmetrical between driver and passenger side. The bodyshell was rated as stable and capable of withstanding further loadings. Side impact: chest, abdomen and pelvis protection was good while head protection was marginal. Side Pole Impact: was not performed as the vehicle does not offer standard side head protection. Whiplash: the seat showed good protection to the adult neck. UN R32: the car meet the rear impact structure requirements. AEB City: has optional AEB but does not meet Latin NCAP requirements to be considered for assessment. Rescue sheet: available according to Latin NCAP criteria.

See protocol

32.69 points · 67%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

Dynamic test score (max. 24)	CRS installation score (max. 12)	Vehicle assessment score (max. 13)
11.69	12.00	9.00

Occupant	Child restraint system	Score	CRS type	Installation	Position
18-month-old child	Joie i-Spin 360	Frontal (max. 8): 3.70 Side (max. 4): 4.00	i-SIZE	ISOFIX/LEG	Rearward facing
3-year-old child	Joie i-Spin 360	Frontal (max. 8): 7.98 Side (max. 4): 4.00	i-SIZE	ISOFIX/LEG	Rearward facing

Installation and equipment assessment
Feature	Front passenger	2nd row outboard	2nd row centre
ISOFIX	NOT AVAILABLE	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
i-Size	NOT AVAILABLE	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Integrated CRS	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE

CRS installation assessment

		2nd row
Reference list		RIGHT	LEFT	CENTRE	RIGHT
Group 0+	Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable	Pass	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Group 0+	Roemer Baby Safe	Exempt	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Group 0+	Bébé Confort Streety Fix / Maxi Cosi Citi SPS	Pass	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Group I	Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable FWF	Pass	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Group I	Graco Cadeira Nautilus FWF	Pass	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Group II/III	Burigotto Multipla 1,2,3	Pass	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Group II/III	Graco Cadeira Nautilus	Pass	Pass	Exempt	Pass

		2nd row
Manufacturer		RIGHT	LEFT	CENTRE	RIGHT
Manufacturer Q1.5	Joie Spin 360 - ISOFIX/LEG	Exempt	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Manufacturer Q3	Joie Spin 360 - ISOFIX/LEG	Exempt	Pass	Exempt	Pass

*Fail only due to failed marking

COMMENTS:

The child seat for the 3-year-old child was installed rearward facing using ISOFIX anchorages and support leg. It was capable of preventing head exposure and offered almost full protection. The Q1.5 was installed rearward facing using ISOFIX anchorages and support leg, the CRS could not prevent the head contact with the front seat. Side Impact: Both CRSs offered full protection. All of the CRSs tested for installation passed. The car has ISOFIX anchorages as standard, meeting also I-size marking requirements. All seating positions are equipped with three-point seatbelts. Airbag warning when a rearward CRS is installed in the passenger seat meets Latin NCAP requirements. The car has passenger airbag disconnection via manual switch via dashboard display as standard.

See protocol

21.75 points · 45%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION (PASSIVE)

15 points

UN127 pedestrian protection regulation

MEETS UN127 REGULATION

	Points	Maximum score
Head impact	16.36	24
Upper leg impact (pelvis)	5.39	6
Lower leg impact	0.00	6

PEDESTRIAN AEB

0.00 points

Pedestrian balancing factor (until 2022)

System name

Minimum speed range (km/h)

Maximum speed range (km/h)

Road user type

Impact speed

System use

PERFORMANCE

Summary

Percentage

COMMENTS:

The car meet UN127 regulation for Pedestrian protection. The car showed majority of areas good protection in the centre of the hood but towards the windscreen edge and front edges weak to poor protection areas were noticed. Bumper protection lower leg was poor in all impact points. Upper leg performance showed adequate and good protection. AEB VRU: the car does not meet Latin NCAP minimum requirements to have AEB considered for assessment and scoring.

See protocol

24.00 points · 56%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

Warning	Driver	Passenger		Rear passengers
SPEED ASSISTANCE (this feature scores only if it is standard in all versions)	0.00	SEAT BELT REMINDER (this feature scores only if it is standard in all versions)		6.00
Visual	OK	OK		NOT OK
Audible	OK	OK		NOT OK
LANE SUPPORT SYSTEMS				-
-
-
System name		-
Functionality		-
Operational from (km/h)		-
Warning		-
LKA Test		-
LDW Test		-
ROAD EDGE DETECTION				-
-
BLIND SPOT DETECTION				-
-
ESC				15
ESC is standard in all versions
ESC meets regulatory requirements of Latin NCAP
ADAC MOOSE TEST
Maximum faultless test speed (km/h)				85
MOOSE TEST: CONSUMER TEST
Maximum faultless test speed (km/h)				70
INTERURBAN AEB				-
System name		-
Functionality		-
Operational from (km/h)		-
Operational speed (km/h) Min \| Max — AEB		-
Operational speed (km/h) Min \| Max — Driver reacts to warning		-
Approaching a slower moving car — AEB		-
Approaching a slower moving car — Driver reacts to warning		-
FOLLOWING A CAR AT SHORT DISTANCE
	AEB		Driver reacts to warning
Car in front brakes gently	-		-
Car in front brakes hard	-		-
FOLLOWING A CAR AT LONG DISTANCE
	AEB		Driver reacts to warning
Car in front brakes gently	-		-
Car in front brakes hard	-		-

COMMENTS:

The car offers SBR in front seating positions only. ESC: The car offers ESC as standard. The Moose test performance reached a maximum of 85 km/h under ADAC Moose test and 70 km/h under Consumer magazine Moose test. SA: the car offers a speed limitation device as standard. BSD: The car does not offer BSD following Latin NCAP criteria for scoring. LSS and RED: The car does not offer LSS or RED following Latin NCAP criteria for scoring. AEB Interurban: The car does not meet Latin NCAP criteria for AEB interurban assessment scoring.

See protocol

Car information
Renegade	1677
5 door SUV	Brazil
2023	Latin NCAP market

Safety information	Driver	Passenger	Rear
Frontal protection
Frontal airbag	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT APPLICABLE
Seat belt pretensioner	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Seat belt load limiter	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Knee airbag	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT APPLICABLE
Side protection
Side head curtain airbag	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
Side head-thorax airbag	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE
Side chest airbag	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NOT AVAILABLE
Side pelvis airbag	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE
Child protection
ISOFIX	NOT APPLICABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	YES OUTBOARD SEATS
Integrated CRS	NOT APPLICABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NO
Airbag cut-off switch	NOT APPLICABLE	YES MANUAL	NOT APPLICABLE
Safety Assist Systems
Seat belt reminder (SBR)	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
Other safety systems
Standard ESC	YES STANDARD
GTR 9-UN 127 Pedestrian protection	MEETS UN127 STANDARD
Pedestrian AEB	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
City AEB	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
Interurban AEB	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
Speed assistance system	YES STANDARD
Lane assistance system	NO - JUST OPTIONAL

FRONT PASSENGER

DRIVER

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)

SIDE POLE IMPACT

Tit