Hyundai New HB20 + 6 Airbags

27.32 points · 68%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

FRONTAL OFFSET DEFORMABLE BARRIER9.68 / 16 p

FRONT PASSENGER

DRIVER

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT1.66 / 3 p

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)7.21 / 8 p

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)

SIDE POLE IMPACT6.76 / 8 p

SIDE POLE IMPACT

UN R32 (max. 1 point)	1
AEB City (max. 3 points)	NO TEST
Rescue Sheet (max. 1 point)	1
Fuel leakage detected after crash test	NO

COMMENTS:

Frontal impact: The protection offered to the driver and passenger head and neck was good, Driver´s chest was weak and passenger chest was adequate. Driver’s knees showed marginal protection and passenger´s left knee showed marginal protection as they can impact dangerous structures behind the fascia. Passenger right knee showed good protection. Driver and passenger´s tibias showed adequate protection. Footwell area was rated as unstable. The bodyshell was rated as unstable and it is not capable of withstanding further loadings. Side impact: Head, abdomen and pelvis protection was good while chest protection was marginal. Side Pole Impact: head and pelvis protection was good, chest protection was marginal abdomen protection was adequate. Whiplash: the seat showed marginal protection to the adult neck. UN R32: the car meet the rear impact structure requirements. AEB City: the car offers AEB City as optional but was not assessed due to not meeting Latin NCAP availability requirements. Rescue sheet: available according to Latin NCAP criteria.

See protocol

36.68 points · 75%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

Dynamic test score (max. 24)	CRS installation score (max. 12)	Vehicle assessment score (max. 13)
15.68	12.00	9.00

Occupant	Child restraint system	Score	CRS type	Installation	Position
18-month-old child	Joie Spin 360	Frontal (max. 8): 7.68 Side (max. 4): 4.00	0+/I	ISOFIX/LEG	Rearward facing
3-year-old child	Joie Spin 360	Frontal (max. 8): 8.00 Side (max. 4): 4.00	0+/I	ISOFIX/LEG	Rearward facing

Installation and equipment assessment
Feature	Front passenger	2nd row outboard	2nd row centre
ISOFIX	NOT AVAILABLE	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
i-Size	NOT AVAILABLE	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Integrated CRS	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE

CRS installation assessment

		2nd row
Reference list		RIGHT	LEFT	CENTRE	RIGHT
Group 0+	Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable	Pass	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group 0+	Roemer Baby Safe	Exempt	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Group 0+	Bébé Confort Streety Fix / Maxi Cosi Citi SPS	Pass	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group I	Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable FWF	Pass	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group I	Graco Cadeira Nautilus FWF	Pass	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group II/III	Burigotto Multipla 1,2,3	Pass	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group II/III	Graco Cadeira Nautilus	Pass	Pass	Pass	Pass

		2nd row
Manufacturer		RIGHT	LEFT	CENTRE	RIGHT
Manufacturer Q1.5	Joie Spin 360 - ISOFIX/LEG	Exempt	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Manufacturer Q3	Joie Spin 360 - ISOFIX/LEG	Exempt	Pass	Exempt	Pass

*Fail only due to failed marking

COMMENTS:

The child seat for the 3-year-old child was installed rearward facing using ISOFIX anchorages and support leg. It was capable of preventing head exposure and offered good protection. The Q1.5 was installed rearward facing using ISOFIX anchorages and support leg, the CRS prevented the head exposure offering full protection. Side Impact: Both CRSs offered full protection. All of the CRSs tested for installation passed. The car has ISOFIX anchorages as standard, meeting also i-size marking requirements. All seating positions are equipped with three-point seatbelts. Airbag warning when a rearward CRS is installed in the passenger seat meets Latin NCAP requirements. The car has passenger airbag disconnection via manual switch as standard.

See protocol

16.47 points · 34%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION (PASSIVE)

15.00 points

UN127 pedestrian protection regulation

DOES NOT MEET

	Points	Maximum score
Head impact	12.26	24
Upper leg impact (pelvis)	1.23	6
Lower leg impact	2.99	6

PEDESTRIAN AEB

0.00 points

Pedestrian balancing factor (until 2022)

15.00

System name

Minimum speed range (km/h)

Maximum speed range (km/h)

Road user type

Impact speed

System use

PERFORMANCE

Summary

Percentage

COMMENTS:

The car does not prove to meet Pedestrian protection UN127 regulations. The car showed majority of head impact areas with marginal and adequate protection. Some areas towards the windshield and A-pillar showed poor protection. Upper leg performance was overall poor and marginal, lower leg performance was weak and marginal. AEB VRU: the car offers AEB VRU as optional but not meeting Latin NCAP availability requirements, it was not assessed.

See protocol

28.00 points · 65%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

Warning	Driver	Passenger		Rear passengers
SPEED ASSISTANCE (this feature scores only if it is standard in all versions)	3.00	SEAT BELT REMINDER (this feature scores only if it is standard in all versions)		10.00
Visual	OK	OK		OK
Audible	OK	OK		OK
LANE SUPPORT SYSTEMS				-
LDW is not available according to Latin NCAP requirements
LKA is not available according to Latin NCAP requirements
System name		-
Functionality		-
Operational from (km/h)		-
Warning		-
LKA Test		-
LDW Test		-
ROAD EDGE DETECTION				-
-
BLIND SPOT DETECTION				-
-
ESC				-
ESC is standard in all versions
ESC meets regulatory requirements of Latin NCAP
ADAC MOOSE TEST
Maximum faultless test speed (km/h)				85
MOOSE TEST: CONSUMER TEST
Maximum faultless test speed (km/h)				70
INTERURBAN AEB				-
System name		-
Functionality		-
Operational from (km/h)		-
Operational speed (km/h) Min \| Max — AEB		-
Operational speed (km/h) Min \| Max — Driver reacts to warning		-
Approaching a slower moving car — AEB		-
Approaching a slower moving car — Driver reacts to warning		-
FOLLOWING A CAR AT SHORT DISTANCE
	AEB		Driver reacts to warning
Car in front brakes gently	-		-
Car in front brakes hard	-		-
FOLLOWING A CAR AT LONG DISTANCE
	AEB		Driver reacts to warning
Car in front brakes gently	-		-
Car in front brakes hard	-		-

COMMENTS:

SBR: The car offers SBR in all seating positions. ESC: The car offers ESC as standard. The Moose test performance reached a maximum of 85 km/h under ADAC Moose test and 70 km/h under Consumer magazine Moose test. SA: the car offers a speed limitation device as standard. BSD: The car does offers BSD but does not meet Latin NCAP availability requirements, it was not tested. LSS and RED: The car does offer LSS and RED but does not meet Latin NCAP availability requirements, it was not tested. AEB Interurban: The car does offer AEB Inter Urban but does not meet Latin NCAP availability requirements, it was not tested.

See protocol

Car information
New HB20	1319
5 door Hatchback - sedan	Brazil
2023	Latin NCAP market

Safety information	Driver	Passenger	Rear
Frontal protection
Frontal airbag	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT APPLICABLE
Seat belt pretensioner	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE
Seat belt load limiter	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Knee airbag	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT APPLICABLE
Side protection
Side head curtain airbag	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD
Side head-thorax airbag	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE
Side chest airbag	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Side pelvis airbag	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE
Child protection
ISOFIX	NOT APPLICABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	YES OUTBOARD SEATS
Integrated CRS	NOT APPLICABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NO
Airbag cut-off switch	NOT APPLICABLE	YES MANUAL	NOT APPLICABLE
Safety Assist Systems
Seat belt reminder (SBR)	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD
Other safety systems
Standard ESC	YES STANDARD
GTR 9-UN 127 Pedestrian protection	NO PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION
Pedestrian AEB	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
City AEB	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
Interurban AEB	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
Speed assistance system	YES STANDARD
Lane assistance system	NO - JUST OPTIONAL

FRONT PASSENGER

DRIVER

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)

SIDE POLE IMPACT

Tit