Fiat Pulse + 4 Airbags

26.87 points · 67%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

FRONTAL OFFSET DEFORMABLE BARRIER13.6 / 16 p

FRONT PASSENGER

DRIVER

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT2.57 / 3 p

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)8 / 8 p

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)

SIDE POLE IMPACT6.68 / 8 p

SIDE POLE IMPACT

UN R32 (max. 1 point)	1
Rescue Sheet (max. 1 point)	1
Fuel leakage detected after crash test	NO

COMMENTS:

Frontal impact: The protection offered to the driver and passenger head and neck was good, driver ?s chest showed marginal protection while passenger chest showed good protection. Driver and passenger´s knees showed good protection. Driver and passenger ?s tibias showed adequate protection. Footwell area was rated as stable. The bodyshell was rated as stable and it is capable of withstanding further loadings. Side impact: Head, chest, abdomen and pelvis protection was good. Side Pole Impact: head, abdomen and pelvis protection were good, chest protection was marginal. Whiplash: the seat showed good protection to the adult neck. UN R32: the car meets the rear impact structure requirements. AEB City: the car offers AEB City as optional but was not assessed due to not meeting Latin NCAP availability requirements. Rescue sheet: available according to Latin NCAP requirements.

See protocol

27.38 points · 56%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

Dynamic test score (max. 24)	CRS installation score (max. 12)	Vehicle assessment score (max. 13)
7.38	12.00	8

Occupant	Child restraint system	Score	CRS type	Installation	Position
18-month-old child	Joie Spin 360	Frontal (max. 8): 7.38 Side (max. 4): 4.00	0+/I	ISOFIX/LEG	Rearward facing
3-year-old child	Joie Spin 360	Frontal (max. 8): 4.00 Side (max. 4): 0.00	0+/I	ISOFIX/LEG	Rearward facing

Installation and equipment assessment
Feature	Front passenger	2nd row outboard	2nd row centre
ISOFIX	NOT AVAILABLE	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
i-Size	NOT AVAILABLE	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Integrated CRS	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE

CRS installation assessment

		2nd row
Reference list		RIGHT	LEFT	CENTRE	RIGHT
Group 0+	Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable	Pass	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Group 0+	Roemer Baby Safe	Exempt	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Group 0+	Bébé Confort Streety Fix / Maxi Cosi Citi SPS	Pass	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Group I	Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable FWF	Pass	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Group I	Graco Cadeira Nautilus FWF	Pass	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Group II/III	Burigotto Multipla 1,2,3	Pass	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Group II/III	Graco Cadeira Nautilus	Pass	Pass	Exempt	Pass

		2nd row
Manufacturer		RIGHT	LEFT	CENTRE	RIGHT
Manufacturer Q1.5	Joie Spin 360 - ISOFIX/LEG	Exempt	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Manufacturer Q3	Joie Spin 360 - ISOFIX/LEG	Exempt	Pass	Exempt	Pass

*Fail only due to failed marking

COMMENTS:

The child seat for the 3-year-old child was installed rearward facing using ISOFIX anchorages and support leg. It was not capable of containing the head and preventing its exposure. The Q1.5 was installed rearward facing using ISOFIX anchorages and support leg, the CRS prevented the head exposure offering almost full protection. Side Impact: The Q3 showed head being exposed and contacting the other CRS during the impact. The Q1.5 CRS offered full protection. All of the CRSs tested for installation passed. The car has ISOFIX I-Size anchorages as standard, meeting also I-size marking requirements. Largest Gabarit could not be installed without interference using the ISOFIX I-Size anchorages. All seating positions are equipped with three-point seatbelts. Airbag warning when a rearward CRS is installed in the passenger seat meets Latin NCAP requirements. The car has passenger airbag disconnection via multimedia system as standard.

See protocol

21.79 points · 45%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION (PASSIVE)

15.00 points

UN127 pedestrian protection regulation

MEETS UN127 REGULATION

	Points	Maximum score
Head impact	13.48	24
Upper leg impact (pelvis)	2.31	6
Lower leg impact	6.00	6

PEDESTRIAN AEB

0.00 points

Pedestrian balancing factor (until 2022)

15.00

System name

Minimum speed range (km/h)

Maximum speed range (km/h)

Road user type

Impact speed

System use

PERFORMANCE

Summary

Percentage

COMMENTS:

The car proved to meet Pedestrian Protection UN127 regulations. The car showed majority of head impact areas with marginal and adequate protection, poor protection towards the windscreen pillars. Only centre areas of the hood offer good protection. Upper leg performance was good in the centre of the vehicle and poor towards the outboard. Lower leg protection was good. AEB VRU: the car does offer AEB VRU even as optional.

See protocol

24.00 points · 56%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

Warning	Driver	Passenger		Rear passengers
SPEED ASSISTANCE (this feature scores only if it is standard in all versions)	3.00	SEAT BELT REMINDER (this feature scores only if it is standard in all versions)		6.00
Visual	OK	OK		NOT OK
Audible	OK	OK		OK
LANE SUPPORT SYSTEMS				-
-
-
System name		-
Functionality		-
Operational from (km/h)		-
Warning		-
LKA Test		-
LDW Test		-
ROAD EDGE DETECTION				-
RED did not confirm operation by validation
BLIND SPOT DETECTION				-
BSD could not be confirmed by validation
ESC				15
ESC is standard in all versions
ESC meets regulatory requirements of Latin NCAP
ADAC MOOSE TEST
Maximum faultless test speed (km/h)				80
MOOSE TEST: CONSUMER TEST
Maximum faultless test speed (km/h)				70
INTERURBAN AEB				-
System name		-
Functionality		-
Operational from (km/h)		-
Operational speed (km/h) Min \| Max — AEB		-
Operational speed (km/h) Min \| Max — Driver reacts to warning		-
Approaching a slower moving car — AEB		-
Approaching a slower moving car — Driver reacts to warning		-
FOLLOWING A CAR AT SHORT DISTANCE
	AEB		Driver reacts to warning
Car in front brakes gently	-		-
Car in front brakes hard	-		-
FOLLOWING A CAR AT LONG DISTANCE
	AEB		Driver reacts to warning
Car in front brakes gently	-		-
Car in front brakes hard	-		-

COMMENTS:

Safety Assist - SBR: The car offers SBR in all seating positions however the rear SBR do not meet Latin NCAP requirements. ESC: The car offers ESC as standard. The Moose test performance reached a maximum of 80 km/h under ADAC Moose test and 70 km/h under Consumer magazine Moose test. SA: the car offers a speed limitation device as standard. BSD: The car does not offer BSD. LSS and RED: The car does offer LSS and RED but does not meet Latin NCAP requirements for scoring. AEB Interurban: The car does offer AEB Inter Urban but does not meet Latin NCAP requirements.

See protocol

Car information
Pulse	1383
5 door Hatchback - sedan	Brazil
2023	Latin NCAP market

FRONT PASSENGER

DRIVER

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)

SIDE POLE IMPACT

Tit