Kia EV4 + 6 Airbags

33.15 points · 83%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

FRONTAL OFFSET DEFORMABLE BARRIER11.58 / 16 p

FRONT PASSENGER

DRIVER

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT2.33 / 3 p

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)8.00 / 8 p

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)

SIDE POLE IMPACT6.24 / 8 p

SIDE POLE IMPACT

UN R32 (max. 1 point)	1
AEB City (max. 3 points)	3
Rescue Sheet (max. 1 point)	1
Fuel leakage detected after crash test	NO

COMMENTS:

Frontal impact: The protection offered to the driver head was adequate and passenger head protection was good. Driver and Passenger neck showed good protection. Driver’s chest showed adequate protection and passenger’s chest showed good protection. Driver’s and passenger’s knees showed marginal protection as they can impact dangerous structures behind the fascia. Driver’s and Passenger’s tibias showed good protection. Footwell area was rated as unstable. The bodyshell was rated as stable and it is capable of withstanding further loadings. Side impact: Head, chest abdomen and pelvis showed good protection. Side Pole Impact: Head, and pelvis showed good protection, chest showed weak protection and abdomen showed adequate protection. Whiplash: the seat showed good protection to the adult neck. UN R32: the car meets the rear impact structure requirements. AEB City: the car offers AEB City as standard meeting the technical requirements achieving full score. Rescue sheet: available according to Latin NCAP criteria.

See protocol

45.00 points · 92%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

Dynamic test score (max. 24)	CRS installation score (max. 12)	Vehicle assessment score (max. 13)
24.00	12.00	9.00

Occupant	Child restraint system	Score	CRS type	Installation	Position
18-month-old child	Joie i-Spin 360	Frontal (max. 8): 8.00 Side (max. 4): 4.00	i-SIZE	ISOFIX/LEG	Rearward facing
3-year-old child	Joie i-Spin 360	Frontal (max. 8): 8.00 Side (max. 4): 4.00	i-SIZE	ISOFIX/LEG	Rearward facing

Installation and equipment assessment
Feature	Front passenger	2nd row outboard	2nd row centre
ISOFIX	NOT AVAILABLE	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
i-Size	NOT AVAILABLE	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Integrated CRS	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE

CRS installation assessment

		2nd row
Reference list		RIGHT	LEFT	CENTRE	RIGHT
Group 0+	Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable	Pass	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group 0+	Roemer Baby Safe	Exempt	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Group 0+	Bébé Confort Streety Fix / Maxi Cosi Citi SPS	Pass	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group I	Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable FWF	Pass	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group I	Graco Cadeira Nautilus FWF	Pass	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group II/III	Burigotto Multipla 1,2,3	Pass	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group II/III	Graco Cadeira Nautilus	Pass	Pass	Pass	Pass

		2nd row
Manufacturer		RIGHT	LEFT	CENTRE	RIGHT
Manufacturer Q1.5	Joie Spin 360 - ISOFIX/LEG	Exempt	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Manufacturer Q3	Joie Spin 360 - ISOFIX/LEG	Exempt	Pass	Exempt	Pass

*Fail only due to failed marking

COMMENTS:

The child seat for the Q1.5 child was installed rearward facing using ISOFIX anchorages and support leg. It was capable of preventing head exposure and showing full protection. The 3-year-old child was installed rearward facing using ISOFIX anchorages and support leg, it was capable of preventing head exposure offering full protection. Side Impact: Both CRSs offered full protection. All seats passed the installation assessment. The car has ISOFIX anchorages that meet also the I-Size requirements. All seating positions are equipped with three point seatbelts. Airbag warning when a rearward CRS is installed in the passenger seat meets Latin NCAP requirements. The car has a passenger airbag disconection as standard.

See protocol

33.23 points · 69%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION (PASSIVE)

21.37 points

UN127 pedestrian protection regulation

MEETS UN127 REGULATION

	Points	Maximum score
Head impact	10.65	24
Upper leg impact (pelvis)	4.72	6
Lower leg impact	6.00	6

PEDESTRIAN AEB

11.86 points

Pedestrian balancing factor (until 2022)

System name

Minimum speed range (km/h)

Maximum speed range (km/h)

PERFORMANCE

Summary

Percentage

Adult running, farside, 50%

100%

Adult walking, nearside, 25%

100%

Adult walking, nearside, 75%

100%

Child running, nearside obscured, 50%

94%

Human Machine Interaction

100%

COMMENTS:

The car proved to meet Pedestrian protection UN127 regulations. The car showed majority of head impact areas in the hood with adequate and marginal protection, towards the a-Pillars and windscreen edge and front outboard edges protection was poor and weak. Upper leg performance was good in most of the front but poor and weak closer to the edges. Lowe Leg: protection is good. AEB VRU: the car offers AEB VRU as standard meeting the technical requirements achieving almost full score.

See protocol

42.25 points · 98%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

Warning	Driver	Passenger		Rear passengers
SPEED ASSISTANCE (this feature scores only if it is standard in all versions)	3.00	SEAT BELT REMINDER (this feature scores only if it is standard in all versions)		10
Visual	OK	OK		OK
Audible	OK	OK		OK
LANE SUPPORT SYSTEMS				1.00
LDW is available according to Latin NCAP requirements
LKA is available according to Latin NCAP requirements
System name		FCA- Car
Functionality		LDW & LKA
Operational from (km/h)		60
Warning		Audible and Visual
LKA Test		PASS
LDW Test		PASS
ROAD EDGE DETECTION				1.00
RED is available according to Latin NCAP requirements
BLIND SPOT DETECTION				3.00
BSD long range was verified by Validation
ESC				15.00
ESC is STANDARD IN ALL VERSIONS
ESC Meets regulatory requirements of Latin NCAP
ADAC MOOSE TEST
Maximum faultless test speed (km/h)				95
MOOSE TEST: CONSUMER TEST
Maximum faultless test speed (km/h)				70
INTERURBAN AEB				8.25
System name		FCA-Car
Functionality		FCW and AEB
Operational from (km/h)		10
Operational speed (km/h) Min \| Max — AEB		10 km/h - 130 km/h
Operational speed (km/h) Min \| Max — Driver reacts to warning		10 km/h - 130 km/h
Approaching a slower moving car — AEB		Crash avoided up to 65 km/h
Approaching a slower moving car — Driver reacts to warning		Crash avoided up to 80 km/h
FOLLOWING A CAR AT SHORT DISTANCE
	AEB		Driver reacts to warning
Car in front brakes gently	Avoidance		Avoidance
Car in front brakes hard	Avoidance		Avoidance
FOLLOWING A CAR AT LONG DISTANCE
	AEB		Driver reacts to warning
Car in front brakes gently	Avoidance		Avoidance
Car in front brakes hard	Avoidance		Avoidance

COMMENTS:

The car offers SBR in all seating positions. ESC: The car offers ESC as standard. The Moose test performance reached a maximum of 95 km/h under ADAC Moose test and 70 km/h under Consumer Moose test. SA: the car offers a speed limitation device as standard. BSD: the BSD is optional meeting the availability and technical requirements. LSS and RED: The car offers LSS as standard, and it showed full score. AEB Interurban: the car offers AEB IU as standard meeting the technical requirements achieving almost full score.

See protocol

Car information
EV4	2100
5 door sedan	Korea
2025	Latin NCAP market

FRONT PASSENGER

DRIVER

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)

SIDE POLE IMPACT

Tit