Toyota Yaris Cross + 6 Airbags

30.80 points · 77%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

FRONTAL OFFSET DEFORMABLE BARRIER12.57 / 16 p

FRONT PASSENGER

DRIVER

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT2.54 / 3 p

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)8.00 / 8 p

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)

SIDE POLE IMPACT6.69 / 8 p

SIDE POLE IMPACT

UN R32 (max. 1 point)	1
AEB City (max. 3 points)	NO TEST
Rescue Sheet (max. 1 point)	0
Fuel leakage detected after crash test	NO

COMMENTS:

Frontal impact: The protection offered to the driver and passenger head and neck was good. Driver’s chest showed marginal protection and passenger’s chest showed adequate protection. Driver’s and passenger’s right knee showed marginal protection and passenger’s left knee showed adequate protection as they can impact dangerous structures behind the fascia. Driver’s and Passenger’s tibias showed good protection. Footwell area was rated as stable. The bodyshell was rated as stable and it is capable of withstanding further loadings. Side impact: Head, chest, abdomen and pelvis showed good protection. Side Pole Impact: Head and pelvis showed good protection, chest showed marginal protection and abdomen showed adequate protection. Whiplash: the seat showed good protection to the adult neck. UN R32: the car meets the rear impact structure requirements. AEB City: the car offers AEB City as optional but does not meet the availability requirements. Rescue sheet: not available according to Latin NCAP criteria.

See protocol

33.95 points · 69%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

Dynamic test score (max. 24)	CRS installation score (max. 12)	Vehicle assessment score (max. 13)
24.00	4.95	5.00

Occupant	Child restraint system	Score	CRS type	Installation	Position
18-month-old child	Joyson (Takata) MIDI	Frontal (max. 8): 8.00 Side (max. 4): 4.00	i-SIZE	ISOFIX/LEG	Rearward facing
3-year-old child	Joyson (Takata) MIDI	Frontal (max. 8): 8.00 Side (max. 4): 4.00	i-SIZE	ISOFIX/LEG	Rearward facing

Installation and equipment assessment
Feature	Front passenger	2nd row outboard	2nd row centre
ISOFIX	NOT AVAILABLE	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
i-Size	NOT AVAILABLE	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Integrated CRS	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE

CRS installation assessment

		2nd row
Reference list		RIGHT	LEFT	CENTRE	RIGHT
Group 0+	Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable	Fail	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Group 0+	Roemer Baby Safe	Fail	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Group 0+	Bébé Confort Streety Fix / Maxi Cosi Citi SPS	Fail	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Group I	Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable FWF	Pass	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Group I	Graco Cadeira Nautilus FWF	Pass	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Group II/III	Burigotto Multipla 1,2,3	Pass	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Group II/III	Graco Cadeira Nautilus	Pass	Pass	Exempt	Pass

		2nd row
Manufacturer		RIGHT	LEFT	CENTRE	RIGHT
Manufacturer Q1.5	-	Fail	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Manufacturer Q3	-	Fail	Pass	Exempt	Pass

*Fail only due to failed marking

COMMENTS:

The child seat for the Q1.5 child was installed rearward facing using ISOFIX anchorages and support leg. It was capable of preventing head exposure and showed full protection. The 3-year-old child was installed rearward facing using ISOFIX anchorages and support leg It was capable of preventing head exposure offering full protection to the passenger. Side Impact: Both CRSs offered full protection. some CRSs passed the installation assessment but some failed in the front passenger seat. The car has ISOFIX anchorages that meet i-Size requirements as standard. All seating positions are equipped with three point seatbelts. Airbag warning when a rearward CRS is installed in the passenger seat does not meet Latin NCAP requirements. The car does not have a passenger airbag disconnection as standard.

See protocol

26.69 points · 56%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION (PASSIVE)

26.69 points

UN127 pedestrian protection regulation

MEETS UN127 REGULATION

	Points	Maximum score
Head impact	18.40	24
Upper leg impact (pelvis)	2.29	6
Lower leg impact	6.00	6

PEDESTRIAN AEB

points

Pedestrian balancing factor (until 2022)

System name

Minimum speed range (km/h)

Maximum speed range (km/h)

PERFORMANCE

Summary

Percentage

Adult running, farside, 50%

Adult walking, nearside, 25%

Adult walking, nearside, 75%

Child running, nearside obscured, 50%

Human Machine Interaction

COMMENTS:

The car proved to meet Pedestrian protection UN127 regulations. The car showed majority of head impact areas in the hood with good and adequate protection, towards the windscreen and a-Pillars protection is marginal, weak to poor. Upper leg performance was mostly poor. Lower leg performance showed good protection. AEB VRU: the car offers AEB VRU as optional but does not meet the availability requirements.

See protocol

25.00 points · 58%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

Warning	Driver	Passenger		Rear passengers
SPEED ASSISTANCE (this feature scores only if it is standard in all versions)	-	SEAT BELT REMINDER (this feature scores only if it is standard in all versions)		10.00
Visual	OK	OK		OK
Audible	OK	OK		OK
LANE SUPPORT SYSTEMS				-
-
-
System name		-
Functionality		-
Operational from (km/h)		-
Warning		-
LKA Test		-
LDW Test		-
ROAD EDGE DETECTION				-
-
BLIND SPOT DETECTION				-
BSD could not be confirmed by Validation
ESC				15.00
ESC is STANDARD IN ALL VERSIONS
ESC Meets regulatory requirements of Latin NCAP
ADAC MOOSE TEST
Maximum faultless test speed (km/h)				105
MOOSE TEST: CONSUMER TEST
Maximum faultless test speed (km/h)				75
INTERURBAN AEB				-
System name		-
Functionality		Not available
Operational from (km/h)		-
Operational speed (km/h) Min \| Max — AEB		-
Operational speed (km/h) Min \| Max — Driver reacts to warning		-
Approaching a slower moving car — AEB		-
Approaching a slower moving car — Driver reacts to warning		-
FOLLOWING A CAR AT SHORT DISTANCE
	AEB		Driver reacts to warning
Car in front brakes gently	-		-
Car in front brakes hard	-		-
FOLLOWING A CAR AT LONG DISTANCE
	AEB		Driver reacts to warning
Car in front brakes gently	-		-
Car in front brakes hard	-		-

COMMENTS:

The car offers ESC as standard. Moose test max speed was 105 km/h for the ADAC Moose scenario and 75 km/h for the Consumer testing scenario. SBR: the car offers front and rear passengers SBR. SAS: The car does not offer speed limitation. BSD: The car does not offer BSD. LSS and RED: the car offers LSS and RED as optional but does not meet the availability requirements. AEB Interurban: the car offers AEB Interurban as optional but does not meet the availability requirements.

See protocol

Car information
Cross	1369
5 door SUV	Indonesia & Brazil
2025	Latin NCAP market

FRONT PASSENGER

DRIVER

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)

SIDE POLE IMPACT

Tit