TEST 2012
Internal combustion
| Voluntary UNECE95 test | Performed - Approved |
|---|
In the frontal impact the driver and passenger heads were both well protected by the restrain systems. Both seatbelts were equipped with pretensioners. There were hazardous structures in the area of the facia that could be impacted by an occupants knees. The structure was able to withstand further loadings.
See protocol| CHILD RESTRAINT SYSTEM | Head / Chest | CRS type | Installation | Position | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18-month-old child | Toyota Romer Babysafe plus | Vulnerable / Poor | 0+ | Belted | |
| 3-year-old child | Toyota Romer Duo Plus | Vulnerable / Poor | 1 | Belted |
The child seat for the 1,5 year old child was able to prevent excessive forward movement during the impact. The 3 year old exceeded the forward excursion limit. The biomechanical limits of the child dummies were reached during the test. The installation instructions on both child seats were sufficient and permanently attached to the seat. The vehicle gives not sufficient warning to the hazards associated with installing a rearward facing child seat on the front passenger seat with an active airbag.
See protocol| Car information | |
|---|---|
| 4 door Hatchback | 2012 |
| Brazil | 1162 Kg |
| Safety equipment | |
|---|---|
| Driver frontal airbag | YES |
| Front passenger frontal airbag | YES |
| Side head airbags | NO |
| Side body airbags | NO |
| Driver knee airbag | NO |
| Front belt pretensioners | YES |