TEST 2013
Internal combustion
In the frontal impact the driver and passenger heads were both well protected by the restrain systems. Passenger seatbelt was not equipped with pretensioner, however the driver seatbelt was equipped with one. There were hazardous structures in the area of the facia that could be impacted by an occupants knees. The structure was able to withstand further loadings.
See protocol| CHILD RESTRAINT SYSTEM | Head / Chest | CRS type | Installation | Position | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18-month-old child | Ford Romer Babysafe plus | Protected / Good | 0+ | ISOFIX | |
| 3-year-old child | Ford Romer Duo Plus | Protected / Fair | 1 | ISOFIX |
The child seat for the 3 year old child was able to prevent excessive forward movement during the impact. High chest deceleration was detected in the 18 months old child. The installation instructions on both child seats were sufficient and permanently attached to the seat. The vehicle did not give any warnings as to the hazards associated with installing a rearward facing child seat on the front passenger seat with an active airbag.
See protocol| Car information | |
|---|---|
| 5 door SUV | 2013 |
| Brazil | 1462 Kg |
| Safety equipment | |
|---|---|
| Driver frontal airbag | YES |
| Front passenger frontal airbag | YES |
| Side head airbags | NO |
| Side body airbags | NO |
| Driver knee airbag | NO |
| Front belt pretensioners | YES |