Chevrolet Aveo + 2 Airbags (Test 2017)

17.49 points / 34.00

FRONT

SIDE

POLE

Not performed

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

Passenger compartment structure	INESTABLE
Side impact protection (structural)	SÍ

COMMENTS:

Frontal impact: The protection offered to the driver head was marginal and passenger head protection was good. Driver chest received poor protection which explains the low star rating. Passenger chest received adequate protection. Driver right femur received poor protection and marginal for the left femur. Passenger right femur showed marginal protection and weak protection in the left femur. Both occupant’s knees were exposed to injuries risks when impacting in dangerous structures behind the dash board and facia. Driver left tibia showed weak protection. Footwell area was rated as unstable and pedal offered a risk to driver’s feet. The bodyshell was rated as unstable. Side impact: The head and pelvis received good protection, chest and abdomen received adequate protection. The car does not offer ESC as standard equipment. All of the above explain the zero stars for adult occupant protection.

See protocol

30.11 points / 49.00

Dynamic test score (max. 24.00)	CRS installation score (max. 12.00)	Vehicle assessment score (max. 13.00)
24.00	3.11	3.00

Occupant	Child restraint system	Dynamic test score (max. 12.00)	CRS type	Installation	Position
18-month-old child	Römer BabySafe	Frontal: 8.00 (max. 8.00) Side: 4.00 (max. 4.00)	0+	Belted	Rearward facing
3-year-old child	Römer Duo Plus	Frontal: 8.00 (max. 8.00) Side: 4.00 (max. 4.00)	0+/1	Belted	Forward facing

CRS installation assessment
		2nd row
Reference list		LEFT	CENTRE	RIGHT
Group 0+	Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group 0+	Roemer Baby Safe	Fail	Fail	Fail
Group 0+	Bébé Confort Streety Fix / Maxi Cosi Citi SPS	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group I	Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable FWF	Fail	Pass	Fail
Group I	Graco Cadeira Nautilus FWF	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group II/III	Burigotto Multipla 1,2,3	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group II/III	Graco Cadeira Nautilus	Fail	Fail	Fail

Manufacturer
		LEFT	CENTRE	RIGHT
Q1.5	Roemer Baby Safe	Fail	Fail	Fail
Q3	Roemer Duo Plus	Pass	Fail	Pass

COMMENTS:

The child seat for the 3-year-old child was installed forward facing using the ISOFIX anchorages and the top tether was able to prevent forward movement during the frontal impact beyond the excursion limits. The Q1.5 was installed rearward facing using the ISOFIX anchorages and support leg and offered good protection during the frontal impact. Side impact: both child dummies were well protected in the side impact. Some of the CRSs that were assessed for installation failed.The marking and instructions in the car in relation to CRS use were poor and not clear for consumers. ISOFIX marking did not meet Latin NCAP requirements. The car does not offer passenger airbag disabling switch to disable the passenger airbag in case a rearward facing CRS will be installed in the front passenger seat. The car offers 3-point belts in all seating positions as standard, and all of them meeting technical international standards. The car also offers ISOFIX anchorages with top tether in both rear outboard seating positions as standard. All the above explains the 3 stars in Child Occupant protection.

See protocol

Car information
4 door sedan	2017
Mexico	1353 Kg
Latin NCAP market

Safety equipment
Driver frontal airbag	YES
Front passenger frontal airbag	YES
Side head airbags	NO
Passenger side head airbags	NO
Side body airbags	NO
Passenger side body airbags	NO
Side curtain airbags	NO
Driver knee airbag	NO
Front belt pretensioners	NO
Passenger front belt pretensioners	NO
Seat belt reminder	Driver
ISOFIX	YES
Anti-lock braking system	NO
ESC (UN13 or GTR8)	NO